<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toot Art - 3</title>
	<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=1658</link>
	<description>A site to feature the art, animation, work and some of the thoughts of the  artists working at Michael Sporn Animation.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Kidney</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=1658#comment-77091</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=1658#comment-77091</guid>
					<description>Oh my goodness, thanks for sharing these, Michael (and John!)

Richard, to further confuse the ratio issue, I believe the film was shot twice in two different formats:  the Cinemascope version, of course, and a square version for 16mm educational release.  I have a reel of the 16mm version and the layout is very different from the widescreen version that was released on DVD.  I'll try to post some comparison screen grabs on my blog soon. You will be surprised at the differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my goodness, thanks for sharing these, Michael (and John!)</p>
<p>Richard, to further confuse the ratio issue, I believe the film was shot twice in two different formats:  the Cinemascope version, of course, and a square version for 16mm educational release.  I have a reel of the 16mm version and the layout is very different from the widescreen version that was released on DVD.  I&#8217;ll try to post some comparison screen grabs on my blog soon. You will be surprised at the differences.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richard O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=1658#comment-76642</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=1658#comment-76642</guid>
					<description>Interesting that the board artist worked at a 4:3 ratio while the film was, and I may be mistaken, Cinemascope (at the very least a widescreen format).

I'm surprised.  With the efficiency of the Disney Studio, I would have figured the aspect ratio would be uniform throughout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the board artist worked at a 4:3 ratio while the film was, and I may be mistaken, Cinemascope (at the very least a widescreen format).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised.  With the efficiency of the Disney Studio, I would have figured the aspect ratio would be uniform throughout.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
