<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bernard Krigstein&#8217;s &#8220;Master Race&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185</link>
	<description>A site to feature the art, animation, work and some of the thoughts of the  artists working at Michael Sporn Animation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:44:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ant</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657933</link>
		<dc:creator>ant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canonical!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canonical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657533</link>
		<dc:creator>the Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks.

I should have been clearer when I wrote that. It does open for me. It just didn’t enlarge like the other pages did.  What you did fixed it. And, it is legible. 

thanks again. 

(and the “the” in the nickname is awkward. I should have just gone with “Gee” but if I had then I would ended up choosing “Gee Willikers”. Which, at the time, would have made sense...to me.

 Soooooooo, “Gee”  works well enough. sorry bout that.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks.</p>
<p>I should have been clearer when I wrote that. It does open for me. It just didn’t enlarge like the other pages did.  What you did fixed it. And, it is legible. </p>
<p>thanks again. </p>
<p>(and the “the” in the nickname is awkward. I should have just gone with “Gee” but if I had then I would ended up choosing “Gee Willikers”. Which, at the time, would have made sense&#8230;to me.</p>
<p> Soooooooo, “Gee”  works well enough. sorry bout that.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657490</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, the Gee, it did open. Unfortunately the scan I received was small, so it couldn&#039;t enlarge any more than it did. I&#039;ve reworked it in photoshop and you can read it now even though the quality is a bit less than others. Not too bad a problem since it&#039;s only type.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the Gee, it did open. Unfortunately the scan I received was small, so it couldn&#8217;t enlarge any more than it did. I&#8217;ve reworked it in photoshop and you can read it now even though the quality is a bit less than others. Not too bad a problem since it&#8217;s only type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657480</link>
		<dc:creator>the Gee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Page 6 of the essay, or krig16.jpg, doesn’t enlarge. 

At least it doesn’t for me. 

Richard, I do recall there being a renewal in interest of Krigstein not too long ago. That Fantagraphics publication likely was a reason why. 

Admittedly, prior to then, the name would not have rang a bell. Though, I am sure there was a slim chance that I had seen some of his work before then. If I had, I wasn’t looking closely enough to realize how cinematic he was in his storytelling.

Though, I say that mainly based upon this story. 
Earlier this year, I watched the movies “The Third Man” and “The Stranger”. This story is about as intense as those are and it doesn’t feel condensed. It is just enough to tell the story. Great draftsmanship. And, while I’m not a fan of narration like that in comics stories, I read it. 

Comics. There’s a lot of great stuff that exists. 

Thanks for sharing this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page 6 of the essay, or krig16.jpg, doesn’t enlarge. </p>
<p>At least it doesn’t for me. </p>
<p>Richard, I do recall there being a renewal in interest of Krigstein not too long ago. That Fantagraphics publication likely was a reason why. </p>
<p>Admittedly, prior to then, the name would not have rang a bell. Though, I am sure there was a slim chance that I had seen some of his work before then. If I had, I wasn’t looking closely enough to realize how cinematic he was in his storytelling.</p>
<p>Though, I say that mainly based upon this story.<br />
Earlier this year, I watched the movies “The Third Man” and “The Stranger”. This story is about as intense as those are and it doesn’t feel condensed. It is just enough to tell the story. Great draftsmanship. And, while I’m not a fan of narration like that in comics stories, I read it. </p>
<p>Comics. There’s a lot of great stuff that exists. </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657438</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelspornanimation.com/splog/?p=3185#comment-657438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantagraphics published an excellent, excellent, excellent (did I mention that it was excellent) volume on Krigstein about 10 years ago.

Like your reaction here, I found it a revelation.  Check it one when you have the chance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantagraphics published an excellent, excellent, excellent (did I mention that it was excellent) volume on Krigstein about 10 years ago.</p>
<p>Like your reaction here, I found it a revelation.  Check it one when you have the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
